The cultivation and development of new quality productivity is a systematic project, and the corresponding support and incentive policies involve many aspects such as scientific and technological innovation. We must adhere to the concept of system, strengthen system integration, form policy synergy, and improve the overall effect.

The policy support required for new quality productivity is mainly reflected in four aspects.

First, policies to support the development of emerging industries and future industries. As an important carrier of new quality productivity, emerging industries and future industries are the sources of new economic growth points, and are also the commanding heights of industries that all countries in the world are trying to seize. At present, some emerging industries and future industries are still facing the dual constraints of immature technology and immature market, and need the guidance and support of policy measures to break through the slow or even stagnant state of development in the natural state.

Second, policies to support scientific and technological innovation. Scientific and technological innovation covers the whole chain of basic research and applied research, including cutting-edge cross-cutting technologies closely related to the development of emerging industries and future industries and key core technologies closely related to the upgrading and development of some traditional industries, as well as peripheral technological innovation and process innovation in traditional industries. The policies in this field are mainly aimed at increasing the enthusiasm of innovation subjects, promoting them to increase innovation investment and enhancing scientific and technological innovation capacity. In addition to incentive policies such as innovation subsidies and tax incentives, they also include policies and measures in the building of national strategic scientific and technological forces, the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, and industry-university-research cooperation.

Third, policies to support educational development and personnel training. The cultivation and development of new quality productivity cannot be separated from scientific and technological talents at all levels, including scientists, technical research and development personnel, engineers, skilled workers, etc., as well as entrepreneurs. It is necessary for the education system to cultivate a sufficient number of various talents with corresponding talents. On the whole, Chinese schools at all levels, especially colleges and universities, need to carry out a series of reforms in the way of education, school-running mode, management system, security mechanism and so on. At the same time, it is necessary to establish a systematic talent policy system including talent team training, talent orderly flow, talent evaluation and incentive, so as to facilitate the enthusiasm and creativity of all kinds of talents.

Some related policies also directly or indirectly affect the cultivation and development of new quality productivity. For example, in terms of financial policy, diversification of financing channels is a necessary condition to support the development of new quality productivity, especially patient capital, which is crucial for the development of future industries from germination to maturity. For example, the high-level opening policy is beneficial to make better use of foreign markets and resources to help the cultivation and development of new quality productive forces in our country.

Since the implementation of various policies is scattered among different subjects, if there is no systematic integration, it is difficult for a number of policies to form a joint force. Especially in the case of a large policy system, some policies may become a short board and drag down the improvement of the efficiency of the entire system, and even there will be a "fight" between different policies, affecting the overall effect of the policy system. Therefore, in order to maximize the effect of policies, we must focus on the core goal of sustainable, rapid and healthy development of new quality productivity and strengthen the integration of policy systems.

In the long run, policy system integration can provide strong support for the sustainable development of new quality productivity in a dynamic changing environment. Technological innovation is constantly breaking through and developing, corresponding to the cultivation and development of new quality productivity is also a dynamic and continuous process, and the composition of industry and technology, the structure of internal factors, and the development conditions are constantly evolving. For example, the current future industry will continue to mature over time, and gradually enter the stage of emerging industries and general industries, in the process, the relevant policy content may be changed. For example, with the improvement of China's high-level socialist market economic system, the decisive role of the market in the allocation of resources will be better reflected, the scope and intensity of the government's role need to be better coordinated with the market mechanism, and the related policies of cultivating and developing new quality productive forces will also change dynamically. Therefore, only by adhering to the policy system integration in a longer period of time and maintaining a broader vision can we ensure that the policy is always maintained within a systematic framework, and thus ensure that the system efficiency is always at a high level.

From a more macro level, policy system integration is conducive to giving play to the advantages of the socialist system. The development history of the world economy shows that scientific and technological innovation, especially the improvement of key core technologies and cutting-edge cross-technology capabilities and long-term maintenance of a high level, is the key to determining the speed and quality of a country's economic growth. Some developing countries fall into the middle-income trap, the direct reason is that they cannot integrate the support system needed to leapfrog the quality of technological innovation, and it is difficult to achieve innovation-driven instead of factor-driven. As a socialist country, China has the advantage of concentrating its resources to do big things. In supporting the development of future industries and emerging industries and promoting technological innovation, continuously strengthening policy integration and promoting policy synergy will inevitably produce a multiplier effect on this advantage and accelerate the cultivation and development of new quality productive forces.

To strengthen the policy system integration, we should pay attention to horizontal integration, and integrate dynamically in the process of policy implementation. Policies formulated in different fields and departments need to be coordinated horizontally to ensure that all policies have the same direction, support each other, and effectively coordinate to maximize their potential.

Traditional industries, emerging industries and future industries have different characteristics, the key links and constraints of cultivating and developing new quality productivity are different, and the corresponding policies for development are also quite different. This requires the systematic integration of relevant policies with different contents and focuses, which not only reflects the differences and pertinence of policies in different industries and different fields, but also unifies complicated policies in a policy system to jointly promote the cultivation and development of new quality productivity.

With the passing of time and the continuous development of the economy, the policy system should be adjusted with The Times according to the specific situation of the development of new quality productivity and the changing trend of internal and external environment, so as to ensure that different policies can cooperate with each other in the dynamic process. Special attention should be paid to the effective connection between new policies and old policies, so as to prevent the negative impact of the connection between new and old policies on the cultivation and development of new quality productivity and the macro economy.

In the process of policy implementation, different departments may have different grasp of policy direction and content. Especially when economic development fluctuates and the external environment changes, some departments may change the content and intensity of policy implementation, and even deviate from the established goals for short-term interests, resulting in the failure to achieve the optimal effect of policy implementation. In this case, the policy implementation of different departments should be systematically coordinated to form an overall effect.

Source: SASAC of The State Council